Teacher In-Service Program

 

1) What is the Teacher In-Service Program?

2) FWCS Teacher in-service programs

a) Program Questionaire

b) Program Results

3) Resources for In-service programs

February 2001 Flyer
March 2001 Flyer
August 2001 Flyer

4) Contact Information

Overall In-Service Program Results

Three in-service programs have been developed and presented by IEEE Florida West Coast Section volunteers. A total of 56 middle and high school teachers from Hillsborough, Manatee, and Sarasota Counties have participated. John Luce, John Twitchell, and Ralph Painter are to be commended for presenting technologically oriented topics that will benefit the teachers who participated and their students for many years.

53 participants completed a twelve-item questionnaire. An item summary of the results of the questionnaire follows and are reported in percentages:

Section I-- Demographic Information

Item #1—What is your current position?

Teacher School-based administrator District personnel Total
96.2 0 3.8 100.0

 

Item #2—If you are a teacher please indicate what grade level(s) you currently teach.

6-8 9-12 Other Total
39.6 56.6 3.8 100.0

 

Item #3—What is the primary subject area you currently teach?

Science Mathematics Technology Engineering Other Total
24.5 3.8 56.6 7.5 7.5 99.9

 

Item #4—Please indicate how many years you have taught in your current school district: (include the current year as one)                                             

3 years or less 4-10 years 11-20 years 21-30 years 31+ years Total
30.2 22.6 22.6 22.6 1.9 99.9

 

Section II—Program Question Results

Item #5—This program has added to my technical knowledge base.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree No Response Total
62.3 35.8 1.9 0 0 100.0

 

Item #6—I will use the concepts presented in my classroom instruction.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree No Response Total
64.2 35.8 0 0 0 100.0

 

Item #7—Today’s topics will increase my student’s level of technological literacy.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree No Response Total
58.5 39.6     1.9 100.0

 

Item #8—The "hands-on" presentation was helpful to me in understanding the concepts discussed.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree No Response Total
58.5 34.0 3.8 1.9 1.9 100.1

 

Item #9—This presentation has increased my level of technological literacy.

Strongly Agree Agree Disagree Strongly Disagree No Response Total
58.5 37.7 3.8 0 0 100.0

 

Section III—Additional Questions

Item #10—Please list additional in-service topics that would be of benefit to you.

  • "Creative problem-solving"
  • "More on the process (application of math and science)."
  • "More hands-on materials."
  • "Waste water treatment."
  • "Make a video (of the same type of information and questions) that teachers could take to school and use."
  • "Economics based back to electrical cost to generate/use."
  • "More ideas with motors"
  • "Electric circuits"
  • "Levers and pulleys"

Item #11—What grade level should technologically oriented in-service programs be presented?

K-2 3-5 6-8 9-12 6-12 All grades No Response Total
  1.9 20.8 32.1 3.8 34.0 7.5 100.1

 

Item #12—How many technologically oriented in-service topics should be offered?   

1-2/yr 3-4/yr 5-6/yr 7+/yr No Response Total
28.3 47.2 15.1 7.5 1.9 100.0

Comment—"You offer them, we will attend."

 

Section IV—Comments From Participants

  • "The lab tours and activities were fantastic! I really appreciate all that you planned for us. This was the 2nd professional day that really will impact my profession. The other was on science research. You guys were a fantastic host!! I wish we could have seen more labs and/or activities. This was wonderful."
  • "More time for lab tours."
  • "Eva, this is ______________________. This was a great day—well planned, well executed. I look forward to working with you in the future."
  • "Great show."
  • "Wonderful job."
  • "Thanks for your efforts/this was great."
  • "We’d like a copy of your overhead diagrams."
  • "Thank you! Great Job!"
  • "Excellent job!"
  • "This is great!"
  • "Wish we had more time"
  • "We need to do more of these programs"
  • "Now we know where the resources are – IEEE"