Technical Sectionhome

  1. 3D Transistors
  2. China Snubs Google
  3. For A Safer Train Journey
  4. iPHONE 4S
  5. Quantum Networking
  6. Techtionary
  7. Wireless Power Transfer

3-D TRANSISTORS : AN INTEL BREAKTHROUGH

by Megha Mehta, BVCOE

Intel’s market share of the chip industry has been phenomenal- with some even calling the figures ‘grotesque’ and ‘obscene’. To further that lead in the smartphones and tablet segment, the semiconductor giant will launch a new breed of transistors in April 2012.

Moore's Law, more a manufacturing rule of thumb than a scientific law, predicts that roughly every two years, the number of transistors on a chip doubles. This, while ensuring that the performance levels never fall and the power consumption is kept to a minimum. Innovations in the chip technology determine the device performance and the power it consumes. After chalking out several strategies for creating ever-shrinking microprocessors and memory units, in keeping with the law, it is becoming more and more difficult to keep up with it. As the size of the transistors keeps shrinking, it's getting harder and more expensive to keep that scaling going. 

Sighting the end of Moore’s law nearly a decade back, Intel took it upon itself to extend it by means of redesigning the current-carrying channel of the MOSFET, which conducts the current in ‘one dimension’. Hence, the ‘planar’.

What has it come up with, you ask? The ‘Tri-Gate or 3-D transistor’, which is really the gate cut on the plane to surround a three dimensional source-drain channel, instead of the traditional placing of the gate on the one dimensional channel. As a result, the gate area increases – offering 37 percent faster switching at the same power or optimum performance at half the power consumed by existing chip designs. This is ideal for shrinking mobile devices with higher performance demands. Point to be noted, as the reader will discover later.

The source-drain channel, now extended to three sides.

Image courtesy: technology.ezinemark.com

  Why the 3 D transistors part-1. While the transistors continued to be shrunk, the gate width (and never the length) was reduced, because smaller lengths caused the current to leak out of the insulating portions of the chip, resulting in higher power usage. 

The etching process at such a scale needs to be precise and since for increasing current, one can't make the channel wider, the solution is to go vertical. This traps more surface area between the channel and gate, and therefore allows better control of its characteristics.

But the classic process of depositing and etching away material to create the integrated circuit does not support the stacking up of gates. Thus, making the current flow in three channels instead of one is the solution that Intel has proposed, with the first batch chips using the 3 D transistors coming out in April 2012, codenamed Ivy Bridge.

According to Intel: "The additional control (3 D channel) enables as much transistor current flowing as possible when the transistor is in the 'on' state (for performance), and as close to zero as possible when it is in the 'off' state (to minimize power), and enables the transistor to switch very quickly between the two states (again, for performance)."

Why the 3D transistors part-2. Work on the 3 D transistor design has been on for over a decade in other semiconductor companies as well. But Intel will have a three year lead if the launch takes place as timed. Industry insiders feel that it is timed to mark Intel’s foray into the smartphone and tablet world, from which it has been curiously and largely absent. Its Atom microprocessor, used in netbooks continues to be outperformed by the designs of the UK-based semiconductor giant ARM Holdings, which owns a monstrous 95% of the market share in chips for most mobile devices. With the tablet-smartphone market catching the consumer’s attention like never before, this has sent the competitors into a tizzy. The industrial demand for the sturdier desktop computers is still greater than that for personal consumption, which gives Intel a monstrous lead in the segment. But with the rapid invasion of the consumer market by tablets, it becomes imperative for Intel to gain a foothold in the mobile device market. The last few years have seen Intel promising x86 mobile devices, but it never quite materialised. Fact remains- Intel’s x86 processor has not found a place in smartphones on a massive scale. Intel has been working on Android 4.0- Ice Cream Sandwich- to add optimizations to finally make it Intel x86 ready, hoping to launch their first x86 powered smartphone in the first half of 2012. Meanwhile, the 3D transistors will perhaps first find place in memory components before anything else.

Considering how a good number of software applications and operating systems are ARM-based and too huge for manufacturers and designers alike to migrate to new chip designs, it remains to be seen if the 3-D transistors live up to their promise.  

 

 

CHINA SNUBS GOOGLE, YET AGAIN

by Gunank Raj, BVCOE

 

The largest populated country in the world has taken its policy of Internet censorship quite too seriously. After blocking notable websites like Facebook, YouTube, Twitter and Picasa, they have added accessibility of android market into this list. However, there is no news on why the marketplace is being blocked. We all are aware of Google’s already stressed relationship with China. The search giant continues to face challenges in providing its services in the nation with the largest population. This move would ultimately hurt both Google and consumers. This news comes as an additional advantage to firms like Apple and Windows as this would help them regain their hold in the Asia-Pacific market.  If their consumers moved away from Android, Google will lose out on access to a major revenue stream which in fact, would be a major blow to Google. A subsidiary of e-commerce giant group Alibaba is also launching a new OS inspired by Google’s Android which would help consumers to get acquainted with the Android based features and foster its hold in Chinese markets, but I can’t help but wonder why Chinese officials tend to block the non-domestic services.

Should the Android Market remain blocked for the long term, this would pose a "serious issue" for Google. Google sees China as a potential market and if this continues, then it would be a major setback for the firm.

Google has subsequently come out to clarify that the restriction in access experienced in China was for the Web-based Android Market only, and that it was down to a software glitch rather than the Chinese government blocking the site.

Some think it is purely because of Google not complying with online laws proposed by China. Or could there be more to this story? But, there is some respite to the existing consumers in that they can still see their contents on local websites, which they are unable to do via the official Google service. 

 

 


FOR A SAFER TRAIN JOURNEY

by Shalvi Shrivastava,

         

Last year alone, there were 17 train crashes in India. Taking into account road, about 60,000 lives are lost every year. That’s 25 times the rate of USA.

That’s the value we have for life in India. It has become routine for the system to report the incident, pay the compensation and forget everything until another tragedy strikes. If not considering the loss of loved ones, it amounts to a great national loss and tragedy.

Fortunately, our system has not been letting the casualness get away with it. And the introduction of Anti-Collision Devices (ACDs) is proof.

The Konkan Railway Corporation has been testing a new version of Anti Collision Devices (ACD) this year. For those who haven’t heard of them, the ACD devices use UHF (ultra-high frequency) radio signals and GPS to automatically activate braking systems on trains that come within 3Km of each other on the same track.

These ACDs, also referred to as ‘Raksha Kavach’, are meant to provide an extra level of protection to the Indian railways apart from the existing systems of signals and interlocking systems. It operates on retro reflection of infra-red waves. It consists of an emitter-sensor module and a reflector. The emitter of one of the trains sends an infra-red wave. If the wave is intercepted by another train, the latter reflects it. For the first train, after receiving the intercepted wave, an alarm is activated and controls and the braking system, for both the trains, controlled simultaneously.

An earlier version of ACD, version 1.0, was tested in Aarkkonam stretch in Tamil Nadu last year.

The new version of ACD includes an algorithm that measures the length of the trains, and eliminates the need to install them inside the guard cabins and at level crossings.

Once the trials for the newer versions are successfully completed, they will be passed onto Railway Design and Standard Organisation, which will then monitor the manufacturing of the hardware.

Concluding all, it is a hope that the increasing degree of unnecessary damage to life and property, all due to human error, would be curbed. And the next time we glance over our morning newspaper, we wouldn’t be horrified by the increasing statistic any further.

 

 

iPhone 4S : THE THING ABOUT THE S

by Abhas Sinha, BVCOE

 

Alright. The iPhone 4. We’ve seen, heard and talked about it so many times now, that it’s almost as if it’s the only smartphone available on the market. Of course, that’s infinitely far from the truth, for Android has long stepped in as a hard player. However, to get down to the numbers, it is the highest selling iPhone yet. And why not? It delivers perfectly on multiple levels, from it’s simple rectangular design, to it’s modest insides that power over a million apps, which, by no means, seem sluggish.

The only reason I mention performance is because there are so many other smartphones that are far more “powerful” than the iPhone when it comes to the ‘numbers’; its screen size is a good 3.5”, and it’s RAM is a slightly underclocked from 512 MB, but that’s still a lot less than, say, a 4.3” screen that is brilliantly sharp, double the memory, and even three more megapixels of imagery, and then, add to that a cheaper price! I’m not drawing these values out of thin air, they actually exist in Samsung’s Android forerunner: The Galaxy S II. Yet, to the end-user, the iPhone still wasn’t a bad bargain. He/she was still far from experiencing dull performance on the comparably slower device. So did it really matter? Not much, considering it did become popular enough to be called simply “iPhone”, sans the four.

However, that was true until the next upgrade shattered expectations of an all new device, and brought in an extremely familiar 4s. If you haven’t already noticed, the pattern is to actually bring in a new iPhone every two years. The year after such a new (looking) device, expect a familiar faceplate with boosted specifications.

But let’s get down to the truth, here.

After you’ve conquered video recording (from the 3G to the 3GS), taken it up to HD and boosted memory enough to run all the games smooth enough to subdue your impatience (from the 3GS to the 4) does it really matter if the iPhone 4 you already know and love goes up a notch from 5 megapixels to 8? It sure didn’t when Samsung tried to ring it in your ears. Does it really grab your attention that the new processor is, well, even faster, even though the RAM’s still the same? Are you going to pay so much for the rise of voice control that’ll soon trickle down to commonplace devices? Should you?

Yes and no.

Excluding the love from Apple fanboys (and girls, mind you), the iPhone finds appeal in those who love it regardless of what it is, and that stems from using iOS -- the OS and heart of every iPhone out there. You see, the world did get divided into ‘the iOS’ and ‘the Android’ (my apologies to the others), and with familiarity of one, came hesitance to migrate to another. Driving down the lineage, you will probably buy the newest iPhone you can, regardless of what I say, but it’s the newcomers that will actually profit Apple in the long term. Which is why we speak now of the relatively indifferent 4s.

Megapixels don’t matter, and RAM won’t make much difference until you’re trying to run “Crysis”. The 4s just has these bumps so that it can officially be in league with competing smartphones. The only “new” feature that will matter to you is Siri -- Apple’s voice control system that is very conveniently integrated into only the 4s. Technically, even a microphone with WiFi can perform the same job, since all of it is server-sided, but it has been coded specifically to prevent that, and as of right now, even jailbreakers have had no luck.

In any event, Siri is, in fact, a brilliant little addition that can slowly become part of your daily life. However, until you speak in an American, British, or even Australian accent, be prepared to encounter minor inconveniences, if not more. Nuance’s recognition system is great, but it isn’t fail-proof. Maybe you could try French if nothing works.

So if you’re heading in line just for Siri, you’re lying. Of course, I’m talking about India, and there aren’t lines here, but you get what I mean. If you’re an Apple fanboy (or girl, again) you’ll buy it as soon as you possibly can, no matter how much more useful the 4s will be. But for everyone else, if you have an iPhone 4, I’d recommend you buy the new guy only if you can reasonably trade in your current phone. Otherwise, try and stay smug with your current phone, whichever one. And if you’re the kind who just wants to shine the Apple logo on the back, just because you think it’s cool to walk like that (and you have a closet full of parrot green tees, and ultra-skinny jeans, all ripped at the knees), please, take mine. We’ll talk price.

 

 

 

QUANTUM NETWORKING

by Stanley Varkey, BVCOE

Even as quantum computing is taking baby steps towards implementational reality, research is underway to facilitate the next logical step i.e. quantum networking.

The basis of quantum networking is formed by the idea of quantum teleportation. As in digital communication where the bits (information) need to be transferred from point A to point B over a channel, so also, quantum networking requires the transmission of qubits between locations.

The problem that need to be solved to make quantum networking possible is scaling up of the principles of 'linkages' and 'superposition' between quantum bits to the level of multiple nodes separated by appreciable distances.

Researchers at the University of Maryland were able to simulate 'propagation' of qubits of a fiber optic channel using photons entangled to the qubits at the transmitter end. In this experiment two atoms of ytterbium were excited to emit two different types of photons such that it reflected the state of the atom. These entangled photons were transmitted over the fiber optic channel to excite the ytterbium atoms at the receiver end to the same state as the ones at transmitting end. Even after the removal of the cable, the atoms remained entangled. Further research and experimentation has led to the development of an all optical, fiber based, high speed switches which do not disturb the physical characteristics of the photons being transmitted.

The development of such technology which allows maintenance of entanglement of qubits over large distances will allow for practically implementing distributed processing and high speed quantum internetworking in the near future.


TECHTIONARY

by Anubhav Proothi, BVCOE

A lot has been spoken of, written about, blogged upon, and debated over how technology changes lives. Conclusions have been drawn, policies have been made, and funds have been allotted. I am not here to judge, comment, or add anything new to the topic. I do have a growing concern, however, about how technology changes the modern English dictionary as we know it. And by ‘change’, I mean drastic, irreversible revolutionizing of the simplest lexical meanings we were taught as kids. In short, words don’t mean what they used to!
If a man, who, let’s say, has been in a state of comma for the last two decades, were to suddenly open his eyes today, he’ll have a hard time adjusting to the new world… And an even harder time trying to talk to it. Why, you ask me? Here’s a list of words that have had recent make-overs. Check it:

WORD
It was essentially a unit of language consisting of one or more spoken sounds. Today it’s a unit of MS Office Suite that people use to type texts such as this one. After they’re done typing, they right-click on every word (original meaning here) that is less than 2 syllables, and replace it with a new, fancy one.

OFFICE
It used to be just a place people worked at. Today it’s a set of software people work on, at their offices. Often preceded by MS.

CLICK
Used to be the sound we made with our fingers when we had an idea, or with our tongues if we were disgusted with an idea. Today, it’s a sound I just made with my mouse. You know very well which mouse I am referring to.

CHIPS
They were the staple diet of a fat guy. Does ‘Bole mere lips… I love Uncle Chips’ ring a bell? Today it’s a very, very inedible piece of silicon exploited by a million machines for personal gains.

APPLE
In my day, apple was a highly reputed fruit that allegedly kept doctors away. Today it’s a multinational corporation that designs and markets state-of-the-art phones, pads, pods and Macs.

JOBS
A piece of work that everyone needs to have to earn a livelihood. Today? Today, he (not ‘it’) is the creator of the aforementioned Apple. A man who was an institution in himself. The Apple of the eyes of every budding computer geek. May his soul rest in peace. Amen!

TABLET
Two years ago, if I went out to buy one of these, you’d have stayed away from me lest you catch my disease. In modern definition, however, it’s a flat rectangular slab that you touch way too much so that a bunch of angry birds can get their revenge.

ANDROID
I bet many of you didn’t know what this originally was. It’s a robot resembling a human being, every sci-fi protagonist’s precious side-kick. Today, it’s an advanced Operating System that puts my outdated radio phone to shame. It’s something you buy under peer-pressure so your cheap friends can ping you on ‘Whatsapp’ and save text balance. 

END

A word that would signify the termination of this text. Today, it means pretty much the same. Because some things never change!

 

 

WIRELESS POWER TRANSFER

by Pramod Yadav, BVCOE

 

Those ubiquitous electrical wires lying across the room, all bunched up in impossible knots and being an eyesore have been quite recently added to my long 'winding' list of pet peeves.

It pleased me immensely when I came to know the geeks out there were working hard to relegate the wires to being relics in museums and make wireless power transfer a feasible reality. Among the first forays into this field was taken up by the bright ones at MIT where they used copper coils to transfer power over a distance of 2 meters using the principle of magnetic induction ( as seen in the transformer).

Even though the transmission of energy wirelessly from the source to the load is widely prevalent in the form of mobile communication, the transfer of power wirelessly poses its own technical problems. In a wireless power transfer system a very large amount of the transmitted power must reach the receiver to make the system economical. Thus the efficiency rather than the Signal to Noise ration is of primary concern.

WPT can be implemented in two general methods:-

First being, ‘resonating inductive coupling’. It is used for the short distance induction. According to the theory, one coil can recharge any device that is in range, as long as the coils have the same resonant frequency. E.g., a recharging mat has coils creating a magnetic field, and electronic devices can use corresponding built in or plug in receivers to recharge while resting on the mat. The advantage of using such a device is contactless, efficient, wire-free power. In the long run, this could reduce our society’s dependence on batteries, which are currently heavy and expensive.

Another technique includes transfer of power through Microwaves using rectennas. This is particularly suitable for long range distances ranging kilometers.

Efficiency: The efficiency of the wireless power is the ratio between power that reaches the receiver and the power supplied to the transmitter. As mentioned earlier, the geeks at MIT successfully demonstrated the ability to power a 60 watt light bulb from a power source that was 2 m. Power transmission via radio waves can be made more directional, allowing longer distance power beaming. The great domestic 'charging point' wars between siblings can be avoided since WPT allows for simultaneous charging of multiple devices. The unmanned planes or robots where wires cannot be involved viz. oceans, volcanic mountains etc which are run by the wireless power over an area, as they could fly for months at a time could be used for research as well as mini satellite.

As for me, I hope to say goodbye to plugs and sockets and a case full of chargers and adapters and black snakes and such likes. Hail wireless!