Editor's Turn
Fellows
Once again your Society board of governors put a simple stake
in the ground starting a new strategy for getting Nominations
for the IEEE Fellow award. In the past it has been a somewhat
market system where those deserving of the nomination and those
qualified to nominate and serve as references had to independently
come up with the desire to fill out the paper work. This system
has worked well for years resulting in 3 - 6 new Fellow awards
to CPMT members each year (although approximately half of these
nominations came through other societies for our members).
This year Jack Balde led the charge by enlisting a panel of 7
CPMT super-volunteers to make a list of our most deserving members
(based on both Society service and technology contributions).
The top dozen of this list were given a chance to be nominated
(not all volunteers want this honor
some serve best anonymously).
Then a nominator volunteered for each candidate and the five Fellow
References were picked from the list of 130 existing CPMT Fellows
(provide by our executive director, Marsha Tickman). In addition,
the historic nomination process continued to generate a few additional
packages.
Since each nomination package involves 7 engineers all meeting
the same deadline, it is still not clear how many candidates will
be submitted by our Society to the IEEE selection committee (it
is not unusual to lose 25% of the nominations based on incomplete
paperwork). However, it looks like the number will be a bit higher
than the historical number, and more to the point, at least a
dozen CPMT volunteers now know the high regard the Society has
for their impressive accomplishments.
Temptation
This is the hardest Newsletter issue for your editor to produce.
A small part of the difficulty is due to a "dead time"
after New Year's Day when even the most fervent CPMT volunteer
news reporter slows down a bit. A bigger problem is the U.S. 1040
tax form that frustrates and exhausted this editor most evenings
during March. But the biggest problem is the large stack of great
books that tempt to take up all my time that is not necessary
to keep from starvation or job loss
call it March madness.
Even as I type this a copy of "Hal's Legacy" from MIT
is on the floor begging to be held. So far this month "Ex-libris"
and "The Cambridge Quintet" have book-napped the editor
for hours at a time. Notice most of these books took years to
catch my attention, but there are 100s more just waiting to side
track me. Successful editors must read a lot faster than me.