IEEE-PSES Symposium
2008
Abstracts
|
October 20-22, 2008
Austin, TX
|
Why Conventional EMC Testing is Insufficient for
Functional Safety (and What To Do About It)
Keith Armstrong
Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) is generally verified/validated
simply by testing the performance of electronic products and equipment
using standardised test methods, in an EMC laboratory. This could be
called the ‘conventional’ approach to achieving EMC.
‘Functional safety’ means the reduction of risks due to operational
(functional) errors or malfunctions, to acceptable levels, over the
anticipated lifetime of a product.
There have long been concerns [1] that the traditional approach to EMC
is inadequate for the achievement of functional safety. In all safety
engineering disciplines other than EMC, it is accepted that it is
insufficient to rely on testing alone to prove the robustness of a
design.
Instead, the achievement of acceptable safety risks are
verified/validated using an approach based that employs a wide variety
of methods (including, but not limited to testing) to verify the
adequacy of the safety design, and how much confidence can be had in it.
This paper describes why the conventional EMC testing approach is
insufficient as the sole means of demonstrating that a design’s EM
characteristics are adequate for functional safety reasons over the
anticipated lifecycle.
It then goes on to describe what EM engineering, verification and
validation techniques are required, where errors or malfunctions in
electronics (hardware and software or firmware) could result in
unacceptable functional safety risks.
The techniques described are based on the forthcoming second edition of
IEC TS 61000-1-2, the IEC’s basic standard on EMC for Functional Safety,
which has been rewritten to become what is essentially the ‘missing EMC
Annex’ to IEC 61508, the IEC’s basic standard on functional safety for
complex electronic systems.
Some industrial companies (for example, some manufacturers of
flight-critical avionics) already employ verification/validation methods
that go well beyond their industry’s standardised EMC test requirements,
to help them achieve confidence that their designs will achieve adequate
functional safety over their lifecycles.
But the use of good ‘EMC-for-functional-safety’ practices is very far
from being as common as it needs to be, especially given the very rapid
increase in the use of increasingly complex electronic devices and
software/firmware in areas where errors or malfunctions could increase
safety risks, in almost all areas of industry from household appliances,
through transport and healthcare to national security.

Full-day workshop on EMC for Functional Safety
Keith Armstrong
This workshop is suitable for all safety engineers and their project
managers, and all EMC (electromagnetic compatibility) engineers and
their project managers, regardless of their level of expertise.
Departmental and general managers will also benefit. Financial managers,
product liability lawyers, government officials and anyone concerned
with risk analysis (safety and/or financial) will also find material of
interest.
Complex electronic technologies (hardware and software) are increasingly
being used in safety-related and safety-critical equipment systems, and
these technologies are themselves rapidly developing in complexity.
All electronic technologies have a tendency to suffer from
electromagnetic interference (EMI), and the more complex and
sophisticated they become, the more susceptible they are.
Functional Safety engineering has developed over the years, especially
in recent years to cope with software, resulting in the basic functional
safety standard for electrical, electronic and programmable electronic
systems: IEC 61508.
IEC 61508 requires that EMI be taken into account in the achievement of
acceptably low functional safety risks – but it doesn't say how this
should be done.
The usual assumption is that complying with the regular emissions and
immunity test standards is sufficient, but this couldn't be more wrong.
EMC test standards have developed independently of safety engineering,
over the decades, and the two disciplines have developed different
concepts and terminologies, making mutual understanding very difficult.
Commercial/industrial test standards are often inappropriate for safety
purposes, and even military and aerospace tests that do attempt to deal
with safety issues are constrained by what can be repeatably achieved by
practical test equipment at an affordable cost and timescale.
To demonstrate that a design had EMC characteristics that would reliably
ensure acceptably low functional safety risks over its operational
lifecycle, would require an EMC testing plan that no organisation, even
governments, could possibly afford. And anyway, it is a general safety
engineering principal that testing on its own is insufficient to prove a
design with sufficient confidence.
The IEC has been developing a standard on how to deal with EMC for
Functional Safety, IEC 61000-1-2, for ten years now, and it is just
coming up to its second edition as an IEC Technical Specification. It is
anticipated that in a few years, it will become a full standard. The
committee for this standard is unusual, in that it consists of both EMC
and Functional Safety experts, and quite a lot of its time has been
spent in the EMC people getting to understand functional safety
engineering jargon and principles, and vice-versa.
The draft 2nd Edition of IEC 61508 references IEC 61000-1-2 for all EMC
issues.
This workshop describes the analysis, design and verification/validation
methodology being adopted by IEC 61000-1-2, and is presented by members
of its committee.
The workshop has four papers, each approximately 1 hour of presentation
and 30 minutes for discussions. The presented material will include
plenty of practical examples. The workshop consists of an overview of
the safety lifecycle, plus what is happening in standardisation, and
then an in-depth look at the first items in the IEC 61508 safety
lifecycle:
1) A brief overview of the whole lifecycle (point of view of a
manufacturer of safety-related systems)
2) Assessing the lifecycle environments (both EM and physical/climatic)
3) Risk assessment and creating the Safety Requirement Specification
(SRS)
4) EM/safety planning
Workshops in future years will discuss the remaining safety lifecycle
issues.
This is not a subject that uses much mathematics — it is more about
employing existing techniques and procedures in new ways to achieve
quantifiable levels of safety when considering the possibilities for
EMI.

Circuit Protection Devices – Selection, Applications &
Case Studies
Ashish Arora
Protection against
over-voltage, over-current, and over-temperature is typically
accomplished using a variety of devices such as fuses, circuit breakers,
thermal cutoffs, positive temperature coefficients (PTCs), metal oxide
varistors (MOVs), power zeners, bi-metallic strips etc. The suitability
of a device for a particular application depends on many factors such as
transient and steady state voltage, current and power ratings, source
impedance, environmental conditions etc. An appropriately selected
device should be capable of protecting the system under the worst case
operating conditions. A designer has available several tools (for
example PSpice, Ansys, etc) to determine the worst case operating
parameters for a particular application. Standards such as IEEE Std.
C62.41 further aid the designer in determining the suitability of the
selected protection device. In addition, potential user misuse of the
system should also be considered when selecting a protection device.
This paper discusses
the design, typical use and failure modes of selected circuit protection
devices. An understanding of the device characteristics and failure
modes will allow a designer to select the appropriate device for the
application. Selected case studies are presented to demonstrate the
problems associated with the absence or inappropriate selection of these
devices.

Available USB and AA Battery Power
Ken Budoff
The ubiquitous presence
of USB and AA type batteries (Alkaline, Ni-MH, Lithium primary) as power
sources for small electronic gadgets is largely accepted without
inspection by safety professionals. Measurements of the amount of
available current and power into low resistance loads from a sample of
both sources is presented. Find out what the data sheets don’t say.
Implications to safety and certifications are considered.

Modeling of Reactions of Cathode with Nonaqueous Solvents in Li-ion
Batteries
W. F. Chen
The reaction of Li1-xCoO2 with nonaqueous solvents has been successfully
modeled by D. D. MacNeil, and J. R. Dahn (Journal of The Electrochemical
Society, 149 (7) A912-A919 (2002)). The reaction proceeds in a clear
stepwise manner through solid phase as a function of temperature. In
the same article, a kinetic description for the stepwise reaction of Li0.5CoO2
in EC/PC was developed using successive Avrami-Erofeev reaction models.
Kissinger estimated the activation energy of this reaction using the
DSC measurements and a special reaction function dy/dt=k(1-y)*2 where t
is the time, k is the reaction constant and y is the ratio of the amount
of cathode already reacted..
In this paper, the authors take a different approach by using the
integral form of the reaction function G(y)=k t instead of the
differential form dy/dt=k.f(y). The SOC (state of charge) is introduced
into the model by assuming G(y) is proportional to SOC and the constant
of proportionality C is the amount determined by the Li1-xCoO2
available for the reaction. Let TTF be the time when the 2nd
phase of the decomposition of Li1-xCoO2 starts.
That is, TTF is the time when swelling starts to accelerate. Then the
relationship between SOC, the absolute temperature (T) and TTF can be
described by the following equation:
Where E is the activation energy, R is the gas constant and A is a “to
be determined” constant.
Applying log to both side of the above equation, we obtain:

Note that for any given SOC, Ln (TTF) is a linear function of 1/T and
the slope is equal to E/R.
Note also that this methodology is independent of the reaction function
f(y) and that Kissinger’s model assumes f(y)=(1-y)*2.
The empirical data (TTF vs T) obtained from the Li-ion polymer cells at
three different SOC’s (corresponding to 3.85V, 4.0 V and 4.2V) shows
that the slope, E/R, is the same for all three SOC’s. Therefore, we
can estimate the activation energy E by dividing the slope by the gas
constant R. The E estimated using this methodology is 1.21 eV which is
reasonably close to the 1.18 eV estimated by the Kissinger method using
DSC data.
The authors have also compared the TTF’s of two different cathode
materials (LCO and NCM) at 100% SOC using the method described in this
article.

Europe's REACH Regulation - Busting the 1 Tonne Myth
Lauren Crane
REACH is the European Regulation that addresses chemical classification,
documentation and labeling, and related authority communications. It
came into effect in June of 2007, and has several staged deadlines from
now until 2018 and later. One of the most common misconceptions about
REACH is that it only applies when you are importing more that 1000kg of
a substance into Europe in a given year. Actually, REACH has criteria
that apply now even for quantities as small as 1 gram. This presentation
will provide a brief over view of REACH and some key high level
concepts, but then delve quickly into the criteria that are applicable
regardless of tonnage. The presentation will address packaged chemicals
bundled with equipment, such as a cleaners, paints, lubricants and ink
cartridges, and 3rd party chemicals that may be required to operate
equipment, as well as the troubling concept of "articles" that release
chemicals under normal conditions.

Obligatory Certification of Electrical Products In
Argentina: 10 years later
Silvia Diaz Monnier
Topics covered will be
the evolution of the electrical safety certification system in Argentina
and the requirements at present for electrical products
commercialization in Argentina.

Halogen Free Electronics – An Overview
Randy Flinders
This presentation will
provide an overview of the newly emerging “Halogen-Free Electronics”
requirement and what it means to the ITE and Consumer Electronics
industry.
Halogen-Free
Electronics requirements have been flying below the radar, but if you
supply components or products to ITE or consumer electronics
manufacturers, this subject should be of interest to you. Topics will
include a basic definition of Halogen-Free, some background and driving
forces behind the Halogen-Free Electronics movement, and industry
expectations for compliance. Halogen-Free standards will be discussed,
including a status on the latest standard currently in development at
IPC, as well as guidance on what manufacturers can do now to prepare for
this requirement.

Global Mains Powering of Information Technology Equipment
Don Gies
This paper explores the different methods to connect information
technology equipment (ITE) to the AC and DC mains in the global
marketplace. It describes the difference in AC power systems around the
world, including the voltages, phases, and plug configurations that vary
country-to-country. It demonstrates single-phase and three-phase power
systems used worldwide, including North American 120/240V, single-phase,
three-wire power system, 120/208V three-phase and 230/400V three-phase
systems. It describes IT power distribution systems, and how to design
and test ITE for connecting to IT power distribution systems. Also, this
paper discusses the different methods used for permanently connecting
ITE to the mains in different regions of the world, and how to design
ITE to accommodate the different installation methods.

Performance and calibration of touch current and
protective conductor current equipment
German Gomez
Explain a technical procedure to verify the initial performance of touch
current and protective conductor current network according to IEC 60990.
Explain a technical procedure to perform the routine calibration
required by quality systems to touch current and protective conductor
current network according to IEC 60990.

The NEW New Approach to technical harmonisation in
Europe
Peter Kelleher
When the New Approach
was originally decided upon by the European Council, it introduced an
innovative approach to legislation and technical harmonisation in the
European Union and it shaped the development of many commonly applied
European Directives including the EMC, the R&TTE and the Low Voltage
Directives. It also paved the way for CE Marking and acceptance of
supplier’s declaration of conformity in Europe.
After more than twenty
years the New Approach is undergoing an extensive revision which will
influence future European directives and revisions to existing ones.
The presentation will
discuss the background to the revision and examine in detail the
practical impact to manufacturers and importers to the European Union as
well as the timing of its implementation. I will highlight significant
changes from current practices or common interpretations.

Safety Pre-testing simplifies NEBS compliance
Dave Lorusso
Do you want your
product to fly through NEBS testing? Who doesn’t. In order to sell
equipment to the Regional Bell Operating Companies (RBOCs), your product
must comply with the NEBS requirements of Telcordia GR-63-CORE and
GR-1089-CORE. Testing throughout the design process simplifies product
development and helps assure equipment compliance to NEBS. This
presentation provides guidance on how to simplify NEBS compliance
through pre-testing.

Where did it come from?
Don Mader
A brief look at some
requirements and how they were developed. Some involved rigorous
science, some involved intuition and others relied on good guess work.
This presentation will take a brief look at the following requirements:
1500-volt dielectric voltage withstand test, Mattress flame test, TV
fire resistant material requirements, Construction requirements for fire
sprinkler "O" rings, Steiner Tunnel, Leakage current and Plenum cable
fire resistance.

A Treatise on Grounding of AC Electrical Systems and
an Atypical Electrocution Case Study
Nosh Medora
In the United States,
“grounded” and “grounding” are defined by the National Electrical Code
(NEC), which is concerned with the safety of life and property. This
paper presents information on grounded and grounding conductors in
single phase and 3-phase service panels. It lists selected components in
a typical service panel including the neutral terminal block and the
ground terminal block.
This paper also
presents potential reasons for ineffective grounding, and further
presents how a fault condition can occur due to an ineffective safety
ground which can possibly result in an electrocution hazard. It also
presents reasons for fault conditions such as frayed or damaged
insulation within the equipment resulting in exposed energized
conductors making contact with the metal enclosure, the presence of a
conductive foreign object bridging the gap between the hot terminal and
the metal enclosure, and other reasons.
This paper further
presents an unusual case study of an inadvertently ungrounded electric
air compressor which was alleged to have resulted in an electrocution.
Review of the plaintiffs’ report and preliminary electrical tests
conducted by the authors indicated a probable different cause.
Subsequently, the authors performed electrical tests using an IEC 60990
human body model (HBM) and confirmed that the alleged air compressor was
probably not the cause of the electrocution. Further investigation
revealed that a different electrical source was the probable cause of
the electrocution.

Case Study – Conductive Contamination – Measuring the
Leakage Resistance of a Single Fastener In Situ in a Transit System
Nosh Medora
Conductive
contamination in electrical systems can result in leakage currents that
may cause misoperation, electrochemical corrosion, and/or ignition of
equipment, and possibly electrocution. One example of the deleterious
effect of conductive contamination is in transit systems.
During normal operation
of transit vehicles, currents drawn by traction motors in the vehicle
cause a voltage to develop on the running rails, causing leakage
currents to flow to ground over the rail fastener surfaces which may be
contaminated with dirt and moisture. These leakage currents can cause
extensive damage, including erosion of the rails, fasteners, and
structural metals. The total leakage current in a system may be readily
measured, and may be tens to hundreds of amperes. However, determining
the electrical resistance of a selected fastener in situ requires
measuring the leakage current of that individual fastener, which is
extremely difficult since the fasteners are electrically connected by
the low impedance of the continuously welded running rails.
This presentation
presents a development procedure and system analysis to measure the
leakage current of one fastener in situ in the Bay Area Rapid Transit
(BART) system without any modification of the rails, and further
presents computer simulations to optimize circuit parameters including
test voltage and frequency.
Using the optimized
parameters, a test instrument was developed using flexible toroidal
current transducers to measure the leakage current of a single fastener
in trackwork in the BART system without any modification of the rails or
use of insulated joints. The proposed test instrumentation was bench
tested, and the relatively high accuracy obtained in measuring leakage
resistance of one fastener in place using the proposed test instrument,
clearly demonstrates the feasibility of such an instrument.

Safety Type-Tests for Component Power Supplies and
Component Transformers
Brian O'Connell
In addition to the
typical series of Type Tests that are performed on component power
supplies and/or component transformers, there are also some test
requirements that are specific to each of the various information
technology, medical, and laboratory product safety standards.
Component power
supplies must also be compatible with local electric codes; there may be
test requirements that are not in the targeted safety standard. These
tests are found in a national version of the standard (typically
delineated in the National Differences and Special National Conditions
of the CB Report), or in local electric codes. Acceptable test technique
and test materials are not always defined.
The paper will focus on
the design and conduct of a type test to indicate conformity to specific
safety requirements for a component power supply and for isolation
component transformers. The repeat or addition of some type tests, based
on the end-use installation and conditions of acceptability, will also
be discussed.
A detailed discussion
of the construction and performance requirements for power supplies and
transformers, for the various standards, is NOT included.

Physical Body Parameter Calculations Based Upon
Electrical Measurement
Peter E Perkins, PE
Analysis of electric
shock effects in people depends entirely upon the body model used as the
basis for the analysis. The usual model has been developed for use
under specific conditions; the conditions seem to get buried with time.
It would be helpful to get additional information such that models
representing varying conditions could be developed for specific
situations.
Traditional circuit
analysis quickly determines the current and voltage in each element of a
circuit. The use of complex variable analysis has long given way to
SPICE like circuit simulators which provide the same results.
Unfortunately, the use of these new computer based methods do not give
rise to broader analysis nor attempts to work backwards through the
analysis to determine the circuit values when a measured output is in
hand.
This paper develops the
complex variable analysis (phasor analysis to EE’s) for the usual human
body model then works backwards from measured body current & voltage
measurements to determine the skin resistance and capacitance for
several subjects under several conditions.
These interesting results
are presented in a way to see some of the internal variations both
within and between individuals.

The Future of Product Safety
Rich Pescatore
They said it couldn't
be done - a safety standard built on the foundation of Hazard-Based
Safety Engineering. But Rich Pescatore is currently leading the
international effort to create just such a standard. It will be known as
IEC 62368 and its scope will be Safety of Information and Communication
Technology Equipment and Audio/Video Equipment. Mr. Pescatore will
review the basis, the scope and the goals of this new standard. He will
share his insight into the challenges being overcome to make this
standard both accurate and useful, and he will describe the work being
done to ensure it will be functional in the all important IECEE CB
Scheme. You will walk away with the latest up-to-date progress being
made on this work.

IECEE - The Worldwide System for Conformity Testing and
Certification of Electrotechnical Equipment and Components
Pierre de Ruvo
In recognition of the need to facilitate international trade in
electrical equipment, primarily intended for use in homes, offices,
workshops, healthcare facilities and similar locations, for benefit of
consumers, industries, authorities etc, and to provide convenience for
manufacturers and other users of the services provided by various
National Certification Bodies (NCBs), an international Scheme is
operated by the IECEE (IEC System for Conformity testing and
Certification of Electrotechnical Equipment and Components), known as
the CB Scheme.
The Scheme is based on the principle of mutual recognition (reciprocal
acceptance) by its members of test results for obtaining certification
or approval at national level.
The Scheme is intended to reduce obstacles to international trade which
arise from having to meet different national certification or approval
criteria. Participation of the various NCBs within the Scheme is
intended to facilitate certification or approval according to IEC
standards.
Where national standards are not yet completely based on IEC standards,
declared national differences will be taken into account; however,
successful operation of the Scheme presupposes that national standards
are reasonably harmonized with the corresponding IEC standards.
Use of the Scheme to its fullest extent will promote the exchange of
information necessary in assisting manufacturers around the world to
obtain certification or approval at national level.
The operating units of the Scheme are the NCBs accepted according to
these Rules. Those NCBs employ testing laboratories also accepted
according to the Rules, known as CB Testing Laboratories (CBTLs). A list
of NCBs is published in the CB Bulletin.
The CB Scheme is based on the use of CB Test Certificates which provide
evidence that representative specimens of the product have successfully
passed tests to show compliance with the requirements of the relevant
IEC standard.
A supplementary report providing evidence of compliance with declared
national differences in order to obtain national certification or
approval may also be attached to the CB Test Report.

Propagating Combustion Faults on Printed Wiring Boards
Gary Tornquist
This insidious type of fault can move along power traces on PCB’s
combusting the epoxy material along the way. This paper develops a basic
the thermal-electric model of the fault to explain feedback involved in
the faults movement. The main inputs to the model, the electrical source
energy and trace geometries are explored. From this understanding,
appropriate design safeguards are qualitatively suggested.

|